'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1)))) , c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} The usable rules are: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} ==> {c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} {c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} ==> {a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} We consider the following path(s): 1) { a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1)))) , c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} The usable rules for this path are the following: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))} We have applied the subprocessor on the union of usable rules and weak (innermost) dependency pairs. 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) , a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1)))) , c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))} and weakly orienting the rules {a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))} Details: Interpretation Functions: a(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] b(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] c(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] a^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [13] c_0(x1) = [1] x1 + [2] c^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [4] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [9] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'fastest of 'combine', 'Bounds with default enrichment', 'Bounds with default enrichment'' ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) , a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} Details: The problem was solved by processor 'Bounds with default enrichment': 'Bounds with default enrichment' -------------------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost relative runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: { a(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c(c(a(x1))) , c^#(x1) -> c_1(a^#(a(a(b(x1)))))} Weak Rules: { c(x1) -> b(a(a(a(b(x1))))) , a^#(b(a(a(a(b(x1)))))) -> c_0(c^#(c(a(x1))))} Details: The problem is Match-bounded by 1. The enriched problem is compatible with the following automaton: { a_1(5) -> 4 , a_1(6) -> 5 , b_0(2) -> 2 , b_1(2) -> 6 , a^#_0(2) -> 1 , a^#_1(4) -> 3 , c^#_0(2) -> 1 , c_1_1(3) -> 1}